Von: "jean verstraeten"
Gesendet: 14.01.07 22:51:16
An: "jean verstraeten"
Betreff: "The British Mind Control Agent"

HOVE (BELGIUM), 14 JANUARI, le14 janvier 2007

L.S. (See englishunderneath)

HET LOONT ZEKER DE MOEITE DE ONDERSTAANDE TEKST VAN23 BLADZIJDEN aandachtig TE LEZEN (IK ONTVING HEM VAN TON HOOGEBOOM).

***

Le texte ci-DESSOUS, DE 23PAGES, VAUT CERTAINEMENTLA PEINE D�ETRE LU ATTENTIVEMENT (JE L�AI RECU DE TONHOOGEBOOM).

***

I SEND THIS TEXT TO MORE ORLESS 5O associations, POLITICIANS ETC. I ALSO SEND A COPY TO A FEWCO-VICTIMS/CO-RESISTERS, IN ORDER TO SHOW THEM THAT I REGULARLY SPREAD TEXTSABT THE SUBJECT. (IN A FIRST ATTEMPT, I COULD NOT REACH YOU, BECAUSE THE SERVERREFUSES DEBORAH DUPRE.  IS DEBORAHAWARE OF THIS? )

IN PACe,

Jean Verstraeten

Vredestraat 65

B-2540 HOVE

( VERSTRAETEN.JEAN@BELGACOM.net=in small Letters : FOR THE MOMENT MY COMPUTER REFUSES TO TYPE SMALL LETTERS)

the British Mind Control Agent

By C L Heywood(Copyright 2006)

Contents

1.     THE BRITISH MIND-CONTROLAGENT (An Introduction)

·       Introduction

·       Battle for the Mind

·       The Mind Controllers (MCs)

·       The Human Brain and Behaviour

·       Covert Wars With CivilianPopulations � Human Experimentation and MKULTRA

2.     ElectronicHarassment and Implant Technology (Mind Control inPractice)

·       Alien Abduction and MedicalExploration

·       The Human Body, Radio Communicationand Electromagnetic Stimulation

·       The Implant Specialists

·       The Gaffer

·       The Design, Testing andAnalysis of Implants

3.     TheHuman Body and Private Home is a Sacred Temple?

the British MindControl Agent

(An Introduction)

Introduction

Conspiracytheory is a very controversial subject and has captivated the media�s attentionfor countless years. Journalists, due to their exceptional capability to sniffout a story, have actively leaked and exposed information of a classifiednature in an effort to prove to themselves and anyone who will listen just howprominent government corruption really is.

            Ona global scale every nation funds its own team of secret police and militaryenforcers whose prime objective is to sustain and develop national-securitystrategies and policy. Understandably the majority of their activities areconducted covertly on an extensive level; MI6, the CIA and the KGB being primeexamples. Their various dealings have always been enlightening if notinteresting, suggesting they have murdered, poisoned, gassed, drugged andbrainwashed enemies of the state and unwitting citizenry on a surprisinglyfrequent basis. It is also proven fact that these intelligence-gatheringestablishments have conducted unethical testing on their own soldiers and intelligencepersonnel using a varied range of lethal arsenal. Journalists have detailedthese arcane schemes and suspicious goings-on in their books, magazines, moviesand television documentaries. �Mind Control� in particular has taken centrestage. John Marks� The Search for the Manchurian Candidate,for instance, highlighted extensive CIA pursuits of mind-control intelligenceand weaponry.

            Undoubtedlythe pungent cocktail of national-security legislation and lack of primarysources to interview places restrictions on the research avenues thatjournalists may pursue. As a result, the secrecy surrounding mind controldevelopments has now piqued unquenchable global curiosity.

Battle for the Mind

Sincethe beginning of civilisation topical issues concerning the human brain havealways attracted substantial attention for a number of obvious reasons. Thehuman brain is a most valuable asset and extremely unique, as it holds theprecious cocktail of individuality and personality. It is what separates thetimid from the aggressive and the academically gifted from Mr Average. Thebrain controls physical movement, all cognitive capabilities (memory, countingand language) and regulates a vast array of bodily functions.

            Althoughsubstantial headway has been made in pursuit of understanding the brain and itsfunction, scientists are still a long way from mastering and controlling themechanisms that work within it. This situation has uncovered many dilemmas forlaw-enforcement agencies, the military and medical communities, who all believethere is great potential to be found in mastering physical control of the brainand mind.

            Criminalpsychologists, for example, are no longer blaming environmental circumstanceand adverse social conditioning as the sole cause of criminal activity. Theystress some individuals may be more susceptible to committing murders andassaults due to their inherited genetic wiring. This theory asserts that thereare chemicals within the brain which can trigger anger and antisocial behaviour.Those who commit grievous bodily harm may be victims of chemical imbalanceswhich they are unable to control without the intervention of drugs and otherinhibitors. Naturally it is hoped that brain exploration will offer someanswers.

            Medicalpractitioners and surgeons believe chemicals in the brain that influencebehaviour may be supplemented or suppressed by drugs which in the long run canmake an individual�s behaviour more desirable and manageable. They foreseegreat potential in the use of implants and other artificial aids to assist thebody�s performance and maintain organs to optimal working condition.Consultants view the exploration and control of the brain as a fascinatingrealm of discovery where new breakthroughs in psychiatric treatment and diseasecan be made. Utilising medical research and analysis, their sole objective isto rid the world of every brain dysfunction and life-threatening conditionknown to mankind.

            Themilitary, unlike the medical and law-enforcement professions, hold slightlydifferent interests in brain exploration. The brain, in their eyes, containsthe ultimate secret to world domination, biological warfare and intelligencegathering. They wish to discover newfound ways to torture, interrogate andannihilate enemy troops and civilians of opposing nations. They stronglybelieve that the man who can crack the complex code of human behaviour is theman who has the power to manipulate, control and modify the actions andthoughts of another.

Itis abundantly clear why so many government-funded establishments are interestedin methods which control human brains and minds because the capability todetect criminals, advance medical technology and win wars runs paramount withthe security and advancement of British society.

1.            Criminalscost the British government millions of pounds in surveillance, rehabilitation,punishment and victim-support services.

2.   Anunhealthy nation places pressure on the social services and hospital staff, aswell as spreading disease and infections which are difficult to eradicate.Humans with permanent illnesses are repeatedly forced into unemployment as aconsequence.

3.            Intelligenceagents and soldiers are very expensive to pay; the government could cut MoD,MI6, police service and MI5 workers by a quarter if they could infiltrateplots, assassinations, expose spies and ascertain threats to national securityusing quality technological surveillance and interrogation techniques.

            Scientistswho can unravel the mysteries of brain function are worth billions of pounds tothe British government and are now in mass abundance. Ultimately, it is theunhealthy and often stressful state of government politics, and heightenedsecurity fears, which have led to the emergence of the mind-controlprofessional.

            Manywill have their own definitions of mind control and its meaning, and thesedefinitions often vary slightly. This paper follows the assertion that �MindControl� encompasses all theoretical and technological applications which areused to gain minimal or complete control over an individual�s brain orpsychological state of mind and behaviour, both covertly and overtly. The aimof the game is to control an individual to the point where he will do themanipulator�s bidding against his will or, alternatively, to adjust hisbehaviour in a desirable way in order to satisfy an expressed agenda, whateverthis may be.

            Britishresearch into mind control technology is a very important issue and stands highon the political agenda.

The Mind Controllers (MCs)

Scientistswho conduct mind control research for British intelligence agencies arecommonly referred to as Mind Controllers (MCs). Their main aim is to:

·       design and produce lethal andnon-lethal mind-control weaponry which can be used against criminals, foreigngovernment spies and military personnel;

·       design and use equipmentwhich can counter the affects of foreign mind-control techniques, and preventspies and terrorists from extracting/intercepting information from Britishagents, military scientists and politicians.

            MCsare a special task force of multi-skilled professionals who are funded by theBritish government as secret agents. These operatives are deployed and assignedto a diverse range of projects depending on their expertise and, as a cohesiveforce, comprise doctors, psychiatrists, neurologists, teachers, criminologists,forensics, IT specialists, telecommunications technicians and child-developmentprofessionals, etc. For the most part MCs are employed within the social careand public service sectors and, as a result, have primary contact with membersof the public. This brings them closer to observing human behaviour in itsrawest form and enables interactivity with personalities and, ultimately,functioning brains. They are by necessity a rather corrupt lot as theirresearch methods often take them down roads which lead to performing bothinvasive and non-invasive procedures on the brains and psyches of well-adjustedcitizens without legal consent. These operatives, for instance, are notoriouslyknown for their involvement with implant technology, psycho chemicals and thebrainwashing of military captives.

            Asactive behavioural scientists MCs are great believers in trial-and-errorexperimentation and follow this principal like a bible. A practising mindcontroller must torture a real human being to acquire credible information ontorture and its effect on the physical body and mental state.

            Thistable represents just a snippet of the work MCs are primarily responsible for,and accounts for the substantial amount of mind and behaviour researchcirculating university lecture theatres and colleges.

Themost alarming aspect of mind control research is that experimentation on theunwitting human being is condoned by security bureaucrats and militarypersonnel, who have convinced themselves and the involved parties that theirsometimes ruthless investigations are honest attempts to search for scientifictruth. It is of small consequence if the pregnant mother is given LSD without herknowledge as the investigative results may revolutionise the way LSD is used inthe future by the British population; and by business sectors who treat LSDaddicts, and pharmaceutical companies that produce and examine LSD properties.

The case of Frank Olson, for instance, in 1953highlighted the dangerously dark side of human experimentation when thescientist plunged to his death from an upper-floor window after CIAmind-control agents spiked his drink with LSD.

 Thephrase �one life for many� is the core golden rationalization here and,irrespective of links with law enforcement, MCs aren�t strangers tounconstitutional murder as some of their projects are terminal, meaning thevictim�s life is expendable and the objectives of the study must be fulfilledby any means necessary.

            Mind-controloperatives establish themselves as law abiding social scientists whose primeobjective is to nurture society to help it flourish and develop to its fullpotential. In the idyllic society man is co-operative, productive, law abidingand happy to help his fellow man. He is flawless, a well-balanced individualwith the drive and motivation to promote and encourage happiness wherever hegoes. There is no place in harmonious society for his exact antithesis. Viatampering with the human brain MCs hope to determine what causes differences inbehaviour and find ways of manipulating the natural processes of thought andbehaviour with the intention of ultimately dictating it.

            Britishsecurity acts legislate MI5 (the security service), MI6 (the secretintelligence service), GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) andnational crime services to work in partnership and direct support of oneanother�s schemes. Mind-control agents are no exception to this rule and havethe full use of government services at their disposal, including theMetropolitan Police Force. Their use of covert torture, expansive spy networkand spates of criminal activity identify them as some of the most influentialand dangerous civil servants functioning in political arenas today.

The Human Brain andBehaviour

Torun a plausible mind control operation MCs must remain informed about newdevelopments within their field. This means being open to the idea thattheorists from a variety of occupational sectors may inadvertently offer new,healthy, innovative notions from which feasible mind control strategies may beborn. This section explores two fundamental mind and behaviour theories.

            Onevery famous pioneer interested in the advancement of brain exploration was DrJose Delgado. He became the Professor of Physiology at Yale University andwrote the controversial book �Physical Control of the Mind: Toward aPsychocivilized Society�. Dr Delgado highlights the need to study the brain asa quest for human survival. He stresses that man survived life where otherspecies, like the dinosaur, failed because of his unique ability to acquireknowledge and adapt his behaviour to the harsh elements. He insists man hascome a long way since realising he could increase his welfare and wealth byinvestigating the properties of the planet and manipulating their function tohis own devices. He portrays the human being as a master manipulator of theenvironment, flawless in many ways but ignorant of the conscious mind workingbehind the innovations and formations he creates. Ideally the doctor hoped touse his findings of brain exploration as a stepping stone to creating ahealthier society.

            Hisgenius lies within his ability to carefully weigh up the advantages andrelevance of brain activity in everyday living. He states the following issuesas being at the foundation of his theory.

�There are basic mechanisms in the brain responsiblefor all mental activities, including perceptions, emotions, abstract thought,social relations, and the most refined artistic creations. These mechanisms maybe detected, analyzed, influenced, and sometimes substituted for by means ofphysical and chemical technology. This approach does not claim that love orthoughts are exclusively neurophysiological phenomena, but accepts the obviousfact that the central nervous system is absolutely necessary for anybehavioural manifestation.� (Delgado J, 1969)

            WhatDr Delgado highlights is the fact that the human body is a machine (controlledby the brain), and that its overall behaviour, response and function may bepredicted and modified. This theory reaffirms the MCs� suspicion that, with theright selection of armaments and expertise to hand, they could manipulate ahuman into doing anything they so desired.

1.      A prisoner of war may be brainwashed into another way of thinking using advanced conditioning and thought-reform techniques. Ultimately, the soldier switches sides and starts working in partnership with the enemy feeling and believing the enemy�s pain.

2.      A human being may be drugged and suspended in an emotional high of acute depression or prolonged euphoria for weeks at a time.

3.      Mind-reading machines could extract a human being�s personal thoughts and decode them into actual verbal or textual output. Intelligence hidden within the realms of the brain would no longer be inviolable.

Tounderstand further the full implications of brain activity on human behaviour,academics Mark Vernon (neurologist) and Ervin Frank (psychiatrist), who areboth active researchers in violence and anger management, highlight someinteresting points in their book �Violence and the Brain�. Although Vernon andFrank agree there are a number of factors such as poverty, family backgroundand negative social conditioning that may contribute and nurture violentbehaviour, they also believe the functioning brain holds substantial influence.They claim that all states of being and behaviour are an indication of thefunctioning areas of the brain; the brain�s interaction with the externalworld, memory and the association the brain makes with past and presentinformation and experience. Chemical balances within the brain, its physicalcomposition and response to transmitted information from the rest of the bodyare all significant influences.

            Vernonand Frank stress that there are parts of the brain that, in �susceptibleindividuals�, help trigger violence. These areas can be pinpointed clearly andare often associated with aggression-based feeding, fleeing, sexual activityand fighting. Their general viewpoint asserts that there are different types ofviolent behaviour, and that these negative outbursts can be analysed andcategorised into predictable causes, influences and outcomes.

From a political perspective, violent acts help to whittleaway and undermine respect and co-operation for the laws the British governmentuphold in the regulation of civilian behaviour. On a global perspective,governments are placed in the inevitable position where they must spendbillions of pounds on an annual basis paying for the damage that (foreign andnative) rioters, terrorists and vigilantes inflict on property. It is,understandably, the MCs� responsibility to help contain this problem andredress the balance of power.

            Dueto the nature of their work (espionage, sabotage and military enforcement) MCsare active participants in violence and aggression, but are also frequentcasualties themselves. It is only logical, therefore, that they maintain avested interest in this arena.

Covert Wars With CivilianPopulations � Human Experimentation and MKULTRA

Mind-controlvictims (MCVs) are very diverse characters of differing background, age, raceand class. Individual claims of victimisation tend to be extremely uncommon andare especially sparse in relation to the world�s population as a whole. One ismore likely to come across witches and Santa Claus than genuine MCVs.

            Firstof all, there aren�t any apparent limitations as to where MCVs and MCs arefound. Evidence clarifies that they are actively resident in America, Sweden,England and Canada, and most likely the rest of the world too. Secondly, humansubjects are usually �Mr Average� and have no social links with eithergovernment agencies or dissident groups. Only a sparse number are members ofspy networks, or terrorists who pose a genuine threat.

            Thegeneral characteristics of mind control victimisation suggest MCs are runningextensive experiments on MCVs ranging across continental borders.

1.      The British are deploying their MCs to foreign countries to acquire experimental subjects.

2.     Operatives are picking toorder individuals of varying background and personality trait forexperimentation at home and abroad. Subjects are administered mind controlarsenal unwittingly in hospitals, military bases, psychiatric institutes andjails. These environments are most beneficial and conducive to mind controlresearch as potential victims are incarcerated for the immediate. This providesMCs with the opportunity to control the treatment that subjects receive, enablinggreater flexibility. Operatives are able to use the results provided asindicators of how their arsenal would realistically perform in the field.

3.     Victims range from thenewborn child to the elderly, suggesting there is a great need for extensivestudies spanning a possible eighty years of an individual�s life. Undoubtedlyhuman development and age influence the efficiency and practicality of someforms of arsenal. When administering hallucinogens, for example, the dosagemust be customised to the size of the person, and gender is an obvious issue.

Perhapsthe most notorious mind control experiments known to mankind were thoseconducted by the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) in the mid-twentiethcentury. They began their research in the early 1950s under the code nameMKULTRA and it was rumoured that superpowers Great Britain and Canada joinedthe MKULTRA scheme as a partnership, aiding with the testing and intelligencegathering. The CIA were particularly interested in studies concerned withmemory enhancement, psychotherapy for psychological-warfare purposes, truthserums, poisons and electroconvulsive therapy.

            TheCIA had an extensive requirement for human subjects and strove hard to findthem. Unwitting victims were the most prized as their reactions to arsenalrealistically put theory into practice and was the ultimate indication ofsuccess or failure.

            MrHarvey Weinstein, a qualified psychiatrist (in partnership with the AmericanPsychiatric Press), published the book �Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of MindControl� to shed some light on the entire MKULTRA affair. In the book, Harveypassionately makes firm reference to his father�s admission to the AllanMemorial Psychiatric Institute (Canada), where he was treated by the renownedprofessional Dr Ewen Cameron who at the time had been commissioned by the CIAto undergo testing on his patients. The experiments hoped to provideexceptional insight into the effects of sensory deprivation, electroconvulsivetherapy, LSD, Chlorpromazine, coercion and thought reform. Dr Ewen Cameroncalled his technique �Psychic Driving�.

            Followingunrelenting global exposure and prosecution from MKULTRA victims, the CIA wererumoured to have burned all their mind-control files during the 1980s. However,conspiracy theorists and members of the American military remain sceptical,believing that the MKULTRA project is thriving but has evolved into a newscheme utilising exactly the same techniques and regimes.

            Britain�sMI6 might not have officially been charged with MKULTRA dealings like the CIAbut were equally active in the programme, and were major players in the racefor political power and world domination. Whilst mind control techniques andstrategies may have changed throughout the decades, the ethos and concept remainsthe same. The British Empire hasn�t faired badly in war on a global perspectiveand their pursuit of mind control strategy may be one of the many reasons why.

Definitions of some of the most prevalent mind controlspecialisms are listed below.

ESB (ElectricalStimulation of the Brain)

ESBinvolved the transmission of electrical currents (using electrodes) todifferent parts of the human brain. Using ESB, MCs could influence the humanthinking process, manipulate motor movements and place victims under a numberof different emotional states, like anger, happiness and fear. ESB proved thehuman body could be controlled externally via the brain by use of permanentlyimplanted electrodes and a remote control.

Sound Technology

Soundtechnology focused on the effects music and sound have on mental health; howcertain lyrics, melodies and frequencies of sound conjure up specificfantasies, thoughts and feelings within the mind. Tunes that were playedrepetitively, for instance, induced depression, violent thoughts, and a senseof loss and helplessness. Others cheered people up and invoked thoughts offreedom, anarchy and happiness. This led to the understanding thatconcentrated, prolonged, highly explicit lyrics could aid interrogations andthe �breaking� of captives. This is because musical lyrics and their topicalcontent (love, family, aspirations, sex and guns) linger within the realms ofthe brain�s thoughts via association even after the tracks have stopped beingplayed. MCs ensure the captive hears music prior to and after interrogation toinvoke emotional instability and lack of confidence.

Brain Mapping

Brainmapping was of great interest and concerned research that helped MCs pinpointwhich parts of the brain and body were responsible for different physicalcapabilities, e.g. the ability to recognise smells, hear, talk, read, countnumbers, be sympathetic and memorise. This line of research was pursuedprimarily with the intention of finding ways to understand and define humanbehaviour for eventual manipulation.

SensoryDeprivation

Sensory-deprivationstudies investigated the psychological and physical effects the prolongedabsence of touch, sight, hearing, smell and taste had on human behaviour.Popular techniques included those of:

• blindfolding captives using goggles and bags;

• forcing captives to wear sound-proof earmuffs;
• afflicting the ears with loud, frightening noises for prolonged periods in pitch darkness;
• bright, fluorescent, flashing lights, which blinded the eyes;
• exposure to severe temperatures of heat and freezing conditions.

Militarycaptives who were consistently denied their physical senses for weekly andmonthly periods were prone to extreme fear, disorientation, dizziness, nausea,trauma and suicidal thoughts. Captives also lost track of time and were unawarewhether it was night or day.

Brainwashing andBehaviour Modification

Thecapability to surreptitiously alter an individual�s point of view and directhim towards another way of thinking attracted radical attention from MI6. Theybelieved human beings could be influenced during interrogation andincarceration periods with greater efficiency, manipulating individualviewpoint and attacking personality trait. This strategy was achieved in thefollowing three ways.

1.      Attacking the identity of the person. Subjects are racially abused; prominent physical features, like a large or small nose, are ridiculed; religious and occupational beliefs are questioned. This depletes the subject�s confidence in himself and, in an ideal scenario, the subject takes on the manipulator�s viewpoint and wallows in self-hatred and pity whilst striving for new perfection.

2.      Stripping the person of all decency. The subject is denied clothes and forced to face the humiliation of being in the nude whilst perpetrators persecute him. He is made to beg for food and water, and asked to complete outlandish tasks, such as standing on one leg and hopping up and down for an hour. This technique reinforces the idea (in the subject�s mind) that he is owned property (a slave) and that to cough, laugh or urinate without being granted permission to do so is a sin and a direct act of defiance, punishable through death.

3.      Enforcing morality and conformity. Using a mixture of positive and negative reinforcement, the subject is rewarded minor praise and gifts for his efforts when his behaviour is deemed acceptable. This means extra recreation time, larger food rations, a clean shower and the acquirement of items like books, pens and paper. In the case of negative reinforcement, the subject is beaten, verbally abused, sexually harassed and tortured using a wide range of arcane instruments. The subject lives by the perpetrator�s rules without questioning them and does what he is told. Out of genuine necessity the subject sees conformity as a means to survival.

Sleep Deprivation

Sleepdeprivation arises when captives are denied sleep for two days or more, therebystifling the nervous system�s ability to function to optimal performance. Themanifestations of prolonged sleep deprivation produce, in human subjects, lossof balance, hallucinations, slurred speech, heightened confusion, exhaustion,disorientation, constant irritability and forgetfulness. British agentsinvolved in the interrogation of suspects rely heavily on this method as itmakes the extraction of information from prisoners easier.

Torture Techniques

Torturebasically incorporates any act used to cause pain and suffering of a captivewith the intent of orchestrating severe punishment, obtaining a confession,coercing individuals to take on a given viewpoint or enforcing behaviourmodification. Torture is an ancient technique often favoured for its aid ininterrogations. Usually the inflictions made on an individual result inbruises, weeping wounds or breakages to the skeleton. MCs, for obvious reasons,felt that prisoners of war could effectively be coerced into disclosingintelligence information through fear for their lives. The torture of enemytroops has always been deemed beneficial because even the smallest details ofinformation can turn a war around and gain the captor a substantial advantage.Strategies utilised included the following.

1.      Stretching. Parts of the body are pulled and strained beyond their full range of motion, causing uncontrollable spasms of pain within the joints and muscles. This can be achieved using the old-fashioned rack, placing ropes on the wrists and ankles so the body is fully suspended and taut.

2.      Cutting, piercing, burning and scolding. This is a slow form of torture where the pressure of discomfort is gradually applied under verbal interrogation. Naked flame, hot coals, heated iron rods and a range of instrumental knives and pins are applied to sensitive parts of the body. Skin gradually sizzles and cuts fester, leaving flesh raw and splotched. Cutting and burning are century-old techniques, valued because the instruments used are cheap and easy to come by, and most British soldiers carry matches and knives as a basic utility. MI6 don�t value this highly as a preferred technique because permanent marks of disfigurement are clearly noticeable and wounds caused by cutting and burning, if left uncleansed, turn sceptic.

3.      Starvation. The captive is denied food and water. The body left without basic sustenance begins to deteriorate. Within one to two weeks the captive is desperate to divulge information that the captors have requested; anything to relieve the demoralising, painful and desperate suffering of dehydration and malnutrition.

4.      Electrocution. Electrocution is utilised because it doesn�t leave cuts or abrasions to the body, and the intensity can be amplified and decreased using a remote control. The use of electrocution as a torture technique is illegal in most nations but is utilised on civilians in the form of an electroshock stun gun or taser gun by American and UK police forces.

Hypnosis

Hypnosisis a state of mind which is induced using concentrated focus and thought aidedby the guidance of an interrogator�s reassuring and convincing voice. Visualstimulation, physical movement, external noise and environmental influence arerestricted so that verbal suggestions are easily assimilated into the target�ssubconscious mind. It is hoped that, once the target leaves the hypnotist�spresence, the information assimilated into the subconscious mind will be recalledby the brain at relevant intervals. The target then believes theknowledge/information which pops up from his subconscious is the ultimate truthand follows this truth as a gut reaction without questioning its logicality.MCs often administer drugs to help induce heightened hypnotic states.

Aswith all mind control techniques, it is the careful mixing of variousapplications, i.e. LSD, hypnosis and torture or sleep deprivation, brainwashingand concentrated interrogation, which makes mind control a worthy adventure.

            MCshave managed to unravel an entire realm of questions and answers regardinghumans and behaviour. They have divulged the great possibilities empowered tocivilisation if the brain is controlled right down to the minutest components.

            Ifmind-control scientists succeed in their technological pursuits, society willundoubtedly have to make way for these new developments and evolve with them.Over a period of countless centuries, MCs will manipulate human-being behaviourusing a range of artificial devices, biological technology and socialconditioning to create the British government�s ideal harmonious civilisation.MCs will also utilise this same technology to bring down populations andforeign armed forces to the brink of destruction. Mind control is a developingscience, which is becoming ever more sophisticated as greater numbers ofcontract-funded intellectuals join the rat race.

ELECTRONICHARASSMENT AND IMPLANT TECHNOLOGY

(Mind Control in Practice)

Alien Abduction andMedical Exploration

Humanbeings throughout the twentieth century have always claimed to be victims ofmind control technology. Aliens from outer space have arrived in UFOs andwhisked them away to unknown planets and subjected them to endless routines oftorture. Implants have been surgically affixed to the ears and sinuses, andbiological mechanisms have been monitored on a frequent basis. Some individualsclaim to have been abducted more than twice and believe they suffer continuousharassment from their alien antagonists.

            DrHelmut Lammer, author of the book �MILABS: Military Mind Control and AlienAbduction�, brings to attention his analysis of implant technology and thealien abduction saga. The doctor claims mind control practice is rife, and paysparticular attention to the CIA and global-warfare history, both past andpresent. He suggests that some alien abductees are disillusioned subjects ofCIA-funded research and, in rare circumstances, have remembered what atrocitieshave befallen them. He backs up this theory with case studies of abductees whohave proof of medical tampering, and the unauthorised deployment of treatmentswhich physicians haven�t mentioned in the consultation room. Brain implants inparticular (of various designs) are most commonly discovered by chance due to apatient�s persistent pursuit of a competent doctor and satisfactory diagnosis.The implants themselves are detected by MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) andx-rays, and can be as small as a grain of rice.

            Heclaims the existence of aliens and their extraterrestrial implants are,therefore, not a reality, rather some fabrication of the truth brought intoexistence by mind-control professionals attempting to quash suspicion and hideillegal activities.

            DrHelmut Lammer alleges implant technology was developed sometime after World WarII due to increased global military competition, and that the researchconducted encompassed aspects of ESB, radio communication and telemetricmonitoring. Electrodes relay information from brain activity to a computer. Thecorrelations of biological activity are in eventuality decoded into actualbehavioural manifestations, allowing the subject�s lifestyle to be understoodand analysed. The doctor states that the similarities between alien implantsand man-made telemetric devices are uncanny, and follows the assertion that theimplants abductees refer to are readily available and marketed to researchprofessionals across the world. Coincidentally, Dr Delgado (clinical biologist)was the specialist responsible for the telemetric implant called the�stimoceiver�, which he designed in the 1960s.

            Thestimoceiver is an implantable device used for direct communication with thebrain. The instrument is fitted with electrodes, which monitor the electricalemissions occurring within different parts of the skull and, most importantly,can send electrical signals to defined parts of the brain to produceinvoluntary actions and mental states. The bio-feedback from the stimoceiver isrelayed to a computer for analysis. The doctor used his stimoceivers onpsychiatric patients undergoing treatment and surmised that he could block thethinking process, inhibit speech and movement, and produce fear andhallucinations. The doctor engineered research which helped establish the factthat correlations of electrical activity within the brain directly correspondwith specific types of behaviour.

            Modernstimoceivers are often referred to as acute probes and have been miniaturisedto a mere 4mm in size. The acute probe is still in its early stages ofdevelopment and, on a legal medical note, is being used to treat illnesses likedystonia and severe depression in suicidal patients. University students andlecturers also utilise them (usually in the operating theatre and in animalexperimentation) for scientific inquiry.

            Thealien-abduction conspiracy follows the assertion that humans are experimentedon: first, as a means to impregnate them for racial mixing; and second, tocause the eventual downfall of the human race using a strong concoction ofbiological warfare and space-age technology. It appears that in twenty-firstcentury Britain extra-terrestrials have some mighty stiff competition from agrowing number of laboratory technicians and medics.

The Human Body,Radio Communication and Electromagnetic Stimulation

Sincethe mid-1990s the World Wide Web has become a major player in globalcommunications and hosts a wide range of forums, clubs and privately run chatrooms where conspiracy theorists converge and exchange information. Mind-controlwebsites are in clear abundance and victimisation claims of electronicharassment highlight that MCs are using a number of prevalent tactics andtechniques.

Audible Voice toSkull and Microwave Hearing

Voiceto skull is a form of radio communication, which enables MCs to transmitconversation directly to the brain. The sound (as described by victims) appearsto radiate from behind the head, the soundwaves transmitting verbalconversation like a walkie-talkie. The sound distance and intensity of radiosignal remains the same regardless of the head�s orientation.

            Thehearing of voices in the head has always been associated with the onset ofschizophrenia but military science suggests the transmission of spoken word tothe brain isn�t an enormous impossibility, and that the science behind itsapplication is coveted by MI6.

            Thetruth is that humans can hear themselves think in spoken word and perceivesound withoutthe aid of their external ears, and it is the complexity of thebrain which empowers this. When human ears detect acoustic sound frequenciesfrom external sources the sound waves are funnelled via the external ear, hitthe eardrum and are translated into nerve impulses, which travel to the brainand are decoded by the brain as sound/verbal speech.

            WhenMCs transmit voice to skull, they speak into a microphone, which transformsverbal speech/sound signals into encoded electrical pulses. Theseradio-frequency pulses are directed at the auditory nerve (bypassing the humanear) directly to the brain, which decodes the electrical pulses intounderstandable spoken word and sound. Ensuring the encoded electrical pulseshit the auditory nerve directly guarantees that only the intended victim hearsthe contact and, like radio DJs (Disc Jockeys), MCs may increase or decreasethe volume and communicate with a subject many miles away.

            AcademicsJoseph C Sharp and Dr A Frey were actually the first scientists to transmitvoice-modulated microwaves at the auditory nerve during their time at theWalter Reed Army Institute of Research. The transmission of sound via theauditory nerve has been practised since the mid-twentieth century and hasproven successful even in hard-of-hearing subjects. The employment of ESBenables targeted subjects to perceive sound depending on the frequency andamplitude of stimulation. The auditory symptoms include those of constantbuzzing, clicks and what is called �ringing in the ears�. If utilised forextended periods of time the loudness and variation in noise causes lack of concentration,distress and high irritability.

            Rumourhas it that voice to skull was intended for soldiers, ensuring headquarters hadunlimited communication, thus enabling the abandonment of conventionalearpiece/microphone headgear, which is a visible target on the battlefield.

            Voiceto skull brings into focus the growing number of psychics, alien abductees,witches and psychiatric patients claiming they can speak to extra-terrestrials,can contact ghosts and liaise with the devil on a frequent basis. The realisationthat MCs may effectively talk themselves into a human being�s life and pose assupernatural powers seems blasphemous. What is clear is that intelligenceagents and medics have tried hard to master this skill and that there are agrowing number of MCVs confirming its deployment.

ElectromagneticTorture � Involuntary Motor Movements and Actions

Abrief consultation with any practising neurologist would confirm that the brainis primarily responsible for all voluntary movements and the co-ordination of avast number of muscles within the body. The fluid movements and precision ofmuscle control executed by break dancers and gymnasts are very muchrepresentative of the brain�s capability. Neurologists can map the functionalareas of the brain in diagram form, enabling them to pinpoint the regions mostresponsible for independent movement. The motor cortex, for example, isresponsible for muscle control within the shoulders, arms, hands, eyes, lips,tongue, fingers and thumbs.

            MCVshave long claimed that MCs have the capability to physically torture themirrespective of global whereabouts. Interestingly, the manipulation of bodilyfunctions, inexplicable muscle movements, pain and weeping wounds MCVs claim toendure are profoundly symptomatic of the acute probe and the electrical signalsit produces to cause involuntary actions.

            MCsaren�t content with the medical profession�s notion of brain stimulation asconsultants utilise electromagnetic research primarily to improve health, notdamage it. MCs are interested in the acute probe as an intelligence aid, so ithelps to know what happens when levels of brain stimulation are increasedbeyond the brain�s natural capacity and capability. Unsurprisingly, increasedexploration of electromagnetic waves has led to the understanding that ESB mayrealistically be used as a torture weapon that surpasses conventional methods.

            MCs,for instance, may inflict muscle spasms (fasciculation) and cramps (muscleshortening contractions) within the human body by applying variations ofelectrical stimulation, causing pain as the muscles and tendons are strainedbeyond their maximum range of motion. This form of torture is useful, the mainadvantage being that sensitive areas of the body, like the genitals, eyes andtongue, may be isolated and afflicted independently. The acute probe�selectrical signals travel from the brain into the spinal cord and stimulate thenerves and then the muscles; the muscle tissue then contracts. In general theseverity of pain and wounds inflicted is dependent upon the longevity andlevels of stimulation targeted at the brain and spine.

            Electromagnetictorture is unique as it is performed without the necessity of incarceration, soMCs needn�t be in close proximity. The victim may, in fact, be over 5,000 milesaway on a distant continent. The greater advantage is that the victim can�tescape his tormentor without appropriate medical intervention, i.e. surgicalremoval of the implant.

The ImplantSpecialists

Theculprits responsible for the upsurge in implant technology are unsurprisinglynot alien invaders but human beings. Implant Specialists (IS) are MCs whoseresearch is specific to implant technology and for the sake of espionage workfor the British government under the umbrellas of MI5 and MI6. They arereflective of the modern warfare practitioner in the sense that, by preference,enemies are fought not in the field using guns and bombs but through utilisingelectronic-communications technology. This way they may collect information,analyse it and aid counter-intelligence operations, both covertly and overtly,limiting the potential number of casualties lost in battle. Implantable devicesare just one of the many sophisticated communications products British securityforces employ, and they are granted ample funding because they aremultifunctional devices favoured for the following three reasons.

1.      Tracking. Tracking devices are inserted within the human body in a variety of places dependant on their exact function, and enable researchers to establish the whereabouts of their target using a receiver that detects the implant�s transmitter signal. This scientific technique is frequently used on mammals like sharks where their movements are tracked within the vast open seas. Conservationists, as a result, are able to locate their shark many miles away and monitor its feeding and migration habits. Modern designs of transmitter are so incredibly small now that they have permitted scientists to keep tabs on the smallest of creatures, like Harvest Mice roaming wild and cultivated fields.

2.      Recording and Monitoring. Implants are designed to act as interactive devices offering a direct link between the human body and computer, like electrocardiograms. These devices enable researchers to study the intimate functions of the body closely by monitoring organ activity and reactivity. They are frequently used in the monitoring and assessment of mental illness, heart activity and brain dysfunction. From an intelligence agency�s perspective, monitoring devices may reveal the biological affects of drugs, dehydration, physical exertion and chronic depression. This type of research is essentially useful to the MoD (Ministry of Defence) as these common conditions often influence soldiers and their performance on the battlefield, interfering with perception, physical co-ordination, eyesight and, ultimately, performance.

3.      Manipulation and Control. These implants are probably the most controversial of all as they are both intrusive and obtrusive to the human body. They empower an external party to influence the thoughts, functional body parts and behaviour of another. The devices themselves are often telemetric instruments and are frequently inserted into laboratory animals undergoing behavioural testing, e.g. a remote control enables researchers to send painful electric shocks to a dog�s brain every time the animal disobeys a command. The dog quickly learns via association and negative reinforcement that if he doesn�t sit when told to he�ll be harmed.

Implantsare attractive in the sense that they are hidden from view within the body andare difficult to detect and remove without professional intervention. One wouldhave to gain access to sanitised operating equipment, x-rays, anaesthesia and askilled surgeon.

            Bearingin mind the surveillance perspective, the possibilities are vast for intelligenceagencies: audio equipment may be inserted under the skin, possibly within theface or arms, and enable operatives to eavesdrop on all of an implantedsubject�s verbal conversations. This tactic surpasses all opportunities offeredby phone tapping and roof surveillance, which are limited once the subjectleaves his bugged household. Interaction with strangers and associates in thestreet is also acquirable without operatives having to rely on second-handinformation from bystanders and culprits who may deceive. The most advancedimplantable device is undoubtedly one which incorporates all five features oftracking, monitoring, manipulation, audio technology and radio communication.

The Gaffer

Perhapsthe easiest way to understand the IS strategy is to view the entire operationas a business where there is a clear, identifiable organisational aim and staffhierarchy; a unified, cohesive workforce of multi-talented professionalsworking a nine-to-five shift to ensure there is twenty-four hour monitoring ofa victim�s life.

Project Co-ordinators

Mind-controloperations always involve an appointed project co-ordinator. The co-ordinatoris the strategic driving force behind the operation and is often in control offunding initiatives, equipment, staffing levels and the distribution ofworkloads. The co-ordinator knows his department and subject area well, and mayspend precious time holding talks and presentations throughout Great Britain atrenowned universities, such as Cranfield. He is a well-paid specialist and moreoften than not has a Masters degree or PhD title to his name. As the headco-ordinator it is his task to be on the lookout for new opportunities tomarket, network, expand and spread the word about his work and team. Primarilythe co-ordinator services the government but, dependant on the politicalenvironment, secrecy acts and commercial influences, expertise and implantabledevices are granted deployment by private institutes and overseas militaryforces. A project co-ordinator�s investigations, for example, may uncover a wayto cause temporary paralysis in implanted victims without the use of drugadministration but using electromagnetic stimulation. This research is likelyto remain classified for the immediate but, eventually, could be used formob-management strategy on a global perspective. The traditional utilisation ofpolice batons, tear gas, dogs and horses to calm rioting crowds would bereplaced with an electromagnetic beam (transmitted from portable transmittersand receivers), which would hit all human brains within a ten-metre radius. Thebeam would cause immediate paralysis in marching rioters, making the bookingand arrest process considerably easier. This strategy would lessen the damageto property, decrease the number of police casualties and relieve pressure fromemergency services. An electromagnetic beam like this transmitted from a tankcould also be utilised on the battlefield to incapacitate enemy forces withoutkilling them, instead rendering them too sick to fight.

Consultants

Theconsultants comprise an invaluable team. Like the project co-ordinator, theyare high-flying, wealthy academics � the best and brightest specialists Britainhas to offer. They are the intelligence scientists who oversee projects andadvise on all aspects of the mind control scheme.

            Thedevelopment of an implant in general requires the full attention and expertiseof many consultants, some of them foreign if absolutely necessary. Theycomprise of the following.

1.      Neurologists and associate medical staff who understand the brain and its complicated activity.

2.      Engineers and medical/pharmaceutical establishments who can design and work the circuitry for miniaturised implants to be tested on animals and, eventually, humans. These implants must be easy to insert, hygienically clean and safe to use on a permanent basis.

3.      Sociologists and statisticians who understand human culture, economic trends and factors that influence them, e.g. birth rate, life expectancy, educational standards, the British population�s health, racial ratios, religious persuasion, class and finance, migration rates and gender studies.

4.      Factory contractors who can mass produce implant technology in secret and at a reasonable price.

5.      Psychologists and psychiatrists who can predict human behaviour under diverse environmental influences and produce behavioural models based on induced mental states.

6.      IT and telecommunications staff at GCHQ who can produce customised communication systems, software and interactive devices to enable the safe, covert detection, monitoring and transmission of information over vast areas of space quickly.

Withoutappropriate input from consultants to advise, research, direct observations andanalyse data, the project co-ordinator and the rest of the mind-control team arecompletely lost in their pursuits and lack the skills to forward the project togreater heights.

Field Agents

FieldAgents are the mind control administrators. Their role is primarilyconcentrated on interacting with the victim in liaison with the projectco-ordinator and consultants� requests. They ensure the close monitoring of thevictim�s life and the networking of information between internal staff.

            Fieldagents must find an effective way to induce and nurture the behaviour that theconsultants wish to observe in the victim. This means attempting to control theenvironment and anything else that may influence the victim�s behaviour.Harassment revolves around the victim�s lifestyle and identity, which may besplit into two major areas of activity.

1.      Home Life and Recreation.

2.      Work Life.

            Wherehome life is concerned, field agents concentrate on family relations andactivities. In this arena agents make frequent contact with the subject�s kin,flashing law-enforcement badges to establish authority. A study on depressionand trauma, for instance, requires that the subject be depressed for extendedperiods of time, and sometimes chronic depressive states have to be induced toacquire the necessary electrode readings. Family contacts ensure the subject isspoken to at necessary intervals and treated accordingly to aid the researchprocess. This may entail boosting the subject�s self-confidence or lowering itusing instructed verbal communication, physical body language andinclusion/exclusion tactics. Families are more often than not happy to complywith demands, especially if led to believe that co-operation may improve theirloved one�s welfare in some way.

            Observationof the employment work-place routine enables agents to familiarise themselveswith the layout of the building and environmental psychology � the lunch room,toilet facilities, common rooms, entrances and exits, and so on. This is sothey may quickly identify where the victim�s work station is situated and howhe will move in and around the office on a daily basis. Agents endeavour tocreate an artificial environment where the victim�s every move is interactedwith, controlled and manipulated on cue to produce prolonged depressive states.Work associates and managers are spoken to in attempts to ensure theenvironmental psychology is in the correct balance and remains so for theduration.

            Fieldagents work in numbers of two or more and, in cases of voice-to-skullharassment, it�s the radio communication from these agents which victims hear.They are also active networkers who keep intact the sourcing of contacts likethe local GP. Victims suffering electromagnetic torture are likely to visit thedoctor more often perhaps than average. The subject will convey information tothe GP about his health, which may be of extreme interest and aids the researchgathering process. In this event, field agents ensure the victim is sent to therelevant specialist and receives meticulous medical examination. Copies of theresults are forwarded to the IS who, upon receipt, will understand theinfluence their electronic harassment is having.

            Fieldagents are great believers in economic sabotage, which is often utilised inattempts to force a victim�s lifestyle to diversify in accordance with researchexpansion. Great Britain, for instance, is run by hundreds of differentgovernmental authorities who as a collective help manage citizenry and divvy upbenefits. Agents understand that the careful, orchestrated withdrawal of theseservices can both damage and improve human welfare relatively swiftly. Thefollowing two theories identify the key ideologies behind economic sabotage.

Employment = PayCheque

The�employment = pay cheque� concept surmises that human survival in Britain comesdown to career prospects and financial status. The capital raised fromemployment ultimately dictates the quality of lifestyle and opportunity asubject may pave for himself. This encompasses educational advantage, his stakein the property market, travel capability, nutritional diet and size of familyhe may comfortably afford, investment opportunities in the stock market,recreational activities and the possession of commodities like cars, computers,digital TV and telephones. Using their law-enforcement status, field agentsillegally force subjects into substantial bouts of employment and falsifiedredundancy to best accommodate their mind control project.

Welfare State =Public Welfare

The�welfare state = public welfare� theory surmises that partial aspects of aBritish citizen�s welfare aren�t necessarily dictated by individual financialstatus. The welfare state and tax system ensures funds are allotted to thosewho most require them as this strategy creates a sense of equality andinclusion amongst the classes. Most importantly, the minimal human requirementsof food, water and shelter are met because British citizens are granted accessto a number of statutory public services. Organisations like the Home Office,NHS, Social Services, Citizen Advice Bureaus, city councils, police forces andlegal aid firms are instrumental to this welfare strategy. In this arena thefield agents� aim is to manipulate the advice, welfare service quality andcustomer care that the subject receives in a way which meets project criterion.The �marginalisation� of the victim within society is most essential; it isimportant that every aspect of the subject�s life is under magnified analysisand is controllable down to the minutest components.

ExperimentalSubjects � Locating Specimens

Acquiringsubjects to serve as guinea pigs for research has never been easier for the IS.The NHS (National Health Service) has an ever growing waiting list of citizensscheduled to visit consultants for a vast variety of ailments and treatments.Registered citizens across Britain have an allocated NHS number and medicalrecord, which enables security forces to identify individuals by:

            TheIS search the NHS medical-file databases for potential victims of relevantidentity, and also have access to medical departments within prisons, militarybases and psychiatric institutes to maximise catchments.

            Inthis arena, operating-theatre staff are sworn to secrecy under security actlegislation. This isn�t to say, however, that medical staff are acutely awarethat the patient concerned might be molested while under the influence ofanaesthesia.

1.      In a realistic scenario how does a surgeon tell whether an acute probe is designed for medical intervention or for surveillance and torture?

2.      If a doctor does, in fact, suspect foul play, how does he deny an agent access to a patient without falling foul of the law himself?

            Doctorshave no jurisdiction over their patients� welfare where security forces areconcerned. Security forces still retain the legal right:

·       to transfer a patient toanother hospital against his wishes;

·                               to extradite a patientwithout medical treatment; and

·                               to administer whatevermedical intervention to a patient they so wish, with or without his consent andknowledge.

            Lookingat the �experimental subjects� theory, it�s easy to understand how MCs �pick toorder� their subjects and distribute implants to so many.

The Design, Testingand Analysis of Implants

There are six essential stagesto the IS testing and analysis strategy.

Research

Design

Testing and Refinement

Implementation

Analysis

Conclusion

            WhereResearchis concerned, consultants analyse the success of bygone experiments as well asappreciate the modern. This entails briefings with professionals of therelevant field and scouring the bookshelves of medical and military librariesfor data-collection purposes. Case studies will be sought and investigated(depicting both success and failure) to highlight potential complications andspark innovative ideas. Foreign intelligence, if available, dictates the plansof action and overall development of implant design, which must be competitiveon a global scale and outperform those already in circulation.

            Usingall the relevant research the consultants have collated, they must then Design astrategy that will help them achieve their objective. They will have to decidewhether or not it is feasible to conduct the project overtly or covertly. Inthe case of a proposed experiment on a human being, the individual�s identity,age, race, class and occupation will be important. It will be decided whetheror not the experimentee is consenting or unwitting, and how one is to go aboutfinding an individual who meets the criteria and specified characteristics. TheIS work in networked multi-disciplinary groups, so at some point relevantparticipants like doctors, military men and psychologists will meet and discussthe options available, and the feasibility and funding of the proposed operation.Various implant designs are sought and their properties investigated.

            Apilot study will be performed for Testing and Refinement purposes. Obviouslythere is the chance of the project design being flawed; it may be that newlyprogrammed equipment is faulty, staff aren�t sure of their role or invaluableresources and funding are withdrawn or dwindled away too quickly for the studyto be concluded. Mistakes are corrected at this point and extensive adjustmentsmade to the overall scheme of things. It is possible in rare circumstances thatthe entire project is abandoned and that the IS decide to start anew. At thispoint in the testing phase they have a vague idea of how the study will pulltogether, the budgeting costs, the risks involved and the quality of researchlikely to be acquired.

            Atthe Implementationstage the team have ascertained where and when the research will beconducted. They will have acquired a number of human subjects who they may tapfor research at relevant intervals. Surveillance and monitoring equipment isset up and professionals who can translate the output are hired. Telemetricdata is recorded and archived whilst undercover field agents are deployed tosubjects� places of domicile to cover environmental and social influences. Themanipulation and sabotage of the subjects� lives will commence onlyif deemed crucial to the objective.

            TheAnalysisand Conclusion involves the dissemination of research. Dependant onthe surveillance systems used, results may be sent away to laboratoryscientists who test and analyse data. The majority of scientists approachedaren�t necessarily part of the IS team and are unaware that the research hasbeen acquired illegally.

            Oncethe reports are compiled, the IS set about building a picture of individualcase files and eventually incorporate the information into a larger overview.They can look for common correlations and patterns of behaviour in the data andstatistics. How the data is analysed will obviously vary, dependent on whetherthe study was to offer investigative, interventive or preventive insight.

            Theexperimentees don�t have faces; they are simply part of a statistic, which isextracted from a computer database for intelligence committees to scrutinise.The final conclusion basically encompasses all the information based on theextensive analysis. If the experiments proved successful there is the option ofpursuing research further or remaining content and assessing ways ofincorporating the intelligence into future operations.

            Froma military perspective the IS have made substantial headway with implanttechnology. They have come to the realisation that the human body is amagnificent weapon in itself, and that all they need do is add a few refinedcapabilities.

1.      Radio Equipment. Surgically implanted sound-sensitive microphones enable operatives to eavesdrop on the verbal interactions occurring within their target�s physical range. This replaces the often favoured ordeal of bugging household premises. Voice to skull (microwave hearing) also enables field agents to speak to their target by transmitting electromagnetic radio frequencies directly to the auditory nerve.

2.      Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Spine/Brain. Permanently implanted electrodes can inflict serious illness, physical wounds and pain. This replaces the common requirement of torture instruments.

3.      Self-destruct Equipment. Throughout military history it hasn�t been uncommon for captives to carry poison pills as a means to commit suicide in the event of capture. Nor has it been uncommon for agents to plant bombs within buildings to kill VIP adversaries at close range. A miniaturised bomb may be implanted within the target�s body and detonated on cue. This way bombs get through Customs undetected and may be carried into high-security establishments, such as the Pentagon.

4.      Tracking Implants. Operatives may locate their targeted victim on a global scale and ascertain their whereabouts by country, borough and street name.

5.      Telemetric Monitoring. Devices implanted in the right regions of the brain or body would alert operatives to their target�s general state of health, like levels of pain and sleep patterns. Operatives are also able to ascertain, from bio-readings, psychological state of mind, stress, body temperature and breathing, etc.

            Realisticallya surgically implanted intelligence agent could infiltrate the most dangerousof terrorist groups, identifying culprits and hierarchy, how the terroristgroup forms and disperses, and where funding and resources are sourced. Theagent may sabotage the operation from the inside whilst adding to Her Majesty�sSecret Service�s wealth of intelligence.

            MCVsengulfed in the design, testing and analysis strategy are simply pawns on achess board. The implants they carry are the early indicators of the Britishgovernment�s �Big Brother� nation. Mind-control implants are primarily designedto be carried by British spies and dissidents (for covert-surveillancepurposes) to track and annihilate the operations of terrorists, criminals andother enemies of state. MCVs are, therefore, the unfortunate casualties of thegovernment�s experimental testing phase, not the long-term ultimate targets.Civilians are the safe alternative to testing on the real thing where, if theoutcome is disastrous, the knock-on effects are limited.

            Todeploy a bugged British spy to the Pentagon and be rumbled would be acatastrophic embarrassment to the British government and could, in extremecircumstance, damage American and British relations. The Americans would detainthe spy, torture him for intelligence and demand a full explanation from theBritish. If a suitable explanation wasn�t forthcoming, they would consider thedeath penalty if their security had been compromised. Preliminary testingphases are only extended to those whose identity is inconsequential. Only oncea technique has been tried and tested over and over with guaranteed resultswill it be used on an enemy of the state.

            TheIS are repeatedly committing crimes in attempts to enhance the safety andsecurity of their country. In this vicious game of silent warfare allcasualties are expendable.

THE HUMAN BODY ANDPRIVATE HOME IS A SACRED TEMPLE?

Mind-controldevelopments bring into question a number of moralistic issues, which arefundamental in preserving the British legal system and human rights.

            Britainhas willingly signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, UnitedNations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and, of course, created theBritish Human Rights Act 1998. The British constitution believes:

• everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person;
• no one shall be held in slavery or servitude � slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms;
• no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
• no one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, or to attacks upon his honour and reputation � everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks;
• everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment;
• no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation;
• everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression � this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

The Right toPrivacy, Freedom of Thought and Health

Theright to privacy grants citizens to live in domestic domicile withoutinterference from the government. Citizens may develop close relationships withwhom they wish whether they be social or sexual. The right to undress and batheoneself in a dignified fashion goes without debate.

            Humansare private creatures and in their element when they have unlimited control oftheir environment. They may control who enters their house, may divulgeinformation about themselves in private conversation, and dictate what theywear and eat. The privately owned house and the goings-on which occur within itgive the individual an impression of territory, ownership and power.

            Brainsenable humans to be independent thinkers; to thrive on the freedoms andopportunities free thought provides. The right to personal autonomy, to developpersonal interests, dictate direction and seek stimulus are major components ofa healthy, balanced mental state.

            MCswork hard to challenge the longstanding assertion that a man�s home environmentis sacred ground, that his physical body and psyche are inviolable, and thatany proposed manipulation or violation is an unholy adventure. They believe thefollowing.

1.      It is dangerous for humans to have freedom of thought, as it isn�t always in check with government idealism.

2.      Humans shouldn�t have a right to privacy if it distorts truth. Who knows what information the average human is concealing?

            Agentswant to live and breathe (in real time) the target�s domesticated lifestyle toultimately investigate and understand it. They have so many questions regardinghuman behaviour and must violate human privacy to make way for their researchteam of prying eyes and surveillance equipment. Only by accomplishing this willthey learn how a human personality is formed and understand the intimacy ofrelationships.

            Unfortunatelyfor the victim, betraying every private thought and intimate moment withgovernment agents is highly likely to traumatise him to the point of severedepression and humiliation and, in an extreme scenario, provoke suicidalthoughts.

Victimisation

Mindcontrol is a form of brain rape and torture; whether the affliction is causedby drug administration, electromagnetic stimulation, brainwashing or thenurture of personality disorders, the end result remains the same. The targetis forced to endure continued harassments. IS mind control, in particular, islikened to slavery because the target�s brain and mind are tapped for researchagainst his will. He is helpless to prevent the intrusion and resist thebrain�s physical and mental reaction to electrode stimulation.

            Todate the American Guantanamo military base displays the most public flagrantdisregard for human rights where systematic mind control is highly prevalent.Freed captives have accused the CIA of utilising sensory-deprivation andsound-technology techniques to install in them fear and hypnotic suggestions.They�ve been denied physical exercise, exposed to severe temperatures andprevented from prayer and conversation. When captives have disobeyed they havebeen beaten, kicked, stripped naked, sexually harassed and threatened withdogs. On the odd occasion captives have been doused with urine and threats havebeen made towards their families if information wasn�t forthcoming in theinterrogation room. Slowly but surely the restraints which have kept the humanbrain and mind inviolable are being eroded by science.

            Solong as it remains national policy to protect the security of the Britishnation and its interests, the government will strive to produce mind controltechniques that are ever more invasive and efficient. Mind control is such anintegrative component of military warfare now that research pertaining to its useis highly classified.

            Thegovernment, of course, denies that Mind Controllers exist. Exposure of theirantics would prove undoubtedly that the government is committing criminal actsagainst the people it is sworn to protect. Exposure would also make folly ofthe laws which govern civilised society.

            Theanswer to the problem is certainly clear; MCs are criminals and should beprosecuted as such. Greater openness and education regarding mind control willhelp aid the legal process and eventual conviction of the perpetrators who wishto make political and financial gain from the suffering of others. It isespecially important that those involved in mental health understand mindcontrol methodology and find ways to effectively treat and reverse the prolongedphysical and psychological effects endured by victims and their families.

Bibliography

1.      Andrew, George (2001). MKULTRA: The CIA's Top Secret Program in Human Experimentation & Behavior Modification, Healthnet Press.

2.      Chavkin, Samuel (1978). The Mind Stealers: Psychosurgery & Mind Control, Houghton Mifflin Company.

3.      Delgado, Jose (1969). Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society, Harper Colophon Books.

4.      Frank, R & Vernon, Mark (1970). Violence and the Brain, Harper and Row.

5.      Lammer, Helmut & Lammer, Marion (1999). MILABS: Military Mind Control & Alien Abduction, IllumiNet Press.

6.      Lifton, Robert J (1989). Thought Reform; the Psychology of Totalism, University of North Carolina Press.

7.      Marks, John (1979). The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, W W Norton & Company.

8.      Scheflin, A & Opton, Edward (1978). The Mind Manipulators, Paddington Press.

9.      Victorian, Armen (1999). The Mind Controllers, Vision Paperbacks.

10.   Weinstein, Harvey (1990). Psychiatry & the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric Press.

Glossary

• MCs � Mind Controllers

Government-fundedagents who conduct mind control-research.

• MCVs � Mind Control Victims

Humanbeings who are used for human experimentation.

• IS � Implant Specialists

Mind-controlagents who specialise in implant technology.