untitled
US
Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
By
Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton
Project
Censored Releases a New study on the History of US Intelligence
Community Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in
Electromagnetic Weapons
Full
Study at:
This
research explores the current capabilities of the US military to use
electromagnetic (EMF) devices to harass, intimidate, and kill
individuals and the continuing possibilities of violations of human
rights by the testing and deployment of these weapons. To establish
historical precedent in the US for such acts, we document long-term
human rights and freedom of thought violations by US
military/intelligence organizations. Additionally, we explore
contemporary evidence of on-going government research in EMF weapons
technologies and examine the potentialities of continuing human rights
abuses.
In
the 1950s and 60s the CIA began work to find means for influencing
human cognition, emotion and behavior. Through the use of the
psychological understanding of the human being as a social animal and
the ability to manipulate a subject’s environment through isolation,
drugs and hypnosis, US funded scientists have long searched for better
means of controlling human behavior. This research has included the use
of wireless directed electromagnetic energy under the heading of
“Information Warfare” and “Non Lethal Weapons.” New technological
capabilities have been developed in black budget projects[1] over the last few decades— including the
ability to influence human emotion, disrupt thought, and present
excruciating pain through the manipulation of magnetic fields. The US
military and intelligence agencies have at their disposal frightful new
weapons, weapons that have likely already been covertly used and/or
tested on humans, both here and abroad, and which could be directed
against the public in the event of mass protests or civil disturbance.
Human
Rights belong to people collectively. To believe in rights for some and
not others is a denial of the humanness of people worldwide. Yet,
denial is exactly what Congress and George W. Bush did with the signing
of the Military Commission Act of 2006. The new official US policy is
that torture and suspension of due process are acceptable for anyone
the president deems to be a terrorist or supporter. This act is the
overt denial of the inalienable rights of human beings propagated in
our Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. More so, US actions declared to the world that the US suspends
human rights for those it believes are evil.
The
precious words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men
are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness,” did not declare that only some men (and women) possess
unalienable rights. Our independence was founded on the understanding
that all men and women are recognized by this nation as having innate
rights derived by their humanity.
Likewise, the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, created by the United Nations in 1948, signed and ratified by
the US Congress, specifies in its preamble that “recognition of the
inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members
of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in
the world.”
The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been a guide for
international law for most of six decades, and as such binds the United
States to its general principles. Article 10 states that “everyone is
entitled to full equality, to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights
and obligations and of any criminal charge against him,” and Article 5
specifically prohibits torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment. Both of these basic human rights have been superceded by
the passage the of Military Commissions Act of 2006.
Additionally,
the Universal Declaration of Human rights declares that everyone has
the right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression and opinion.
This means that humans have the inalienable right to be able to freely
think their own thoughts and discover their own truths. This paper
addresses this most fundamental human right and explores the pending
threats to individual freedom of thought posed by new EMF weapons
technologies.
Freedom
of thought or cognitive liberty is the natural human right of each
person to be secure in their ability to perceive the world to the best
of their ability. To have true cognitive liberty in a world as complex
as ours would mean that first we must have access to truthful and
unbiased information about the actions of others and the general state
of the world. The Center for Cognitive Liberties defines this as “the
right of each individual to think independently and autonomously, to
use the full spectrum of his or her mind, and to engage in multiple
modes of thought.”[2] Without accurate
representations we cannot make independently informed choices. It is
imperative that the human body and mind be considered sacrosanct. To
invade a person’s body without their consent is an egregious human
rights crime.
The
circumstance may soon arrive in which anti-war or human rights
protesters suddenly feel a burning sensation akin to touching a hot
skillet over their entire body. Simultaneously they may hear terrifying
nauseating screaming, which while not produced externally, fills their
brains with overwhelming disruption. Not only are both phenomena
currently possible, but designs for more powerful EMF technologies
receive continuous funding from the US Government.
For
the US Government to unilaterally declare that our country will not
comply with international human rights laws, nor uphold the core values
of our nation’s foundation is an indication of extremism that
supersedes the values and beliefs of the American people. When such
extremism exists we need to take seriously the founders’ declaration
that, “ to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it
is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing
its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect
their Safety and Happiness.” (Declaration of Independence 1776)
[1] Black budgets are government funded projects that are
classified/secret to Congress and the American people. For an in-depth
analysis on the topic, see Weiner, Tim , Blank Check: The
Pentagon's Black Budget, Warner: 1990.